The Endogenous Sustainable Economy
A business that operates sustainably at the highest level is not just maximizing profits in the present, it’s also securing the highest possible return on its current investments for the future. This shift represents a fundamental change in how business must be conducted in the 21st century.
Now, this is a crucial point: Even without discounts, concessions, or marketing their sustainable practices, when businesses make sustainability—true sustainability—a core part of their operations, the economic benefits become self-evident. If this approach were scaled across industries, not only would the need for regulations diminish, but resource scarcity would also decrease. This, in turn, would lower production costs across the board and prevent the compounding financial burden of environmental degradation. Currently, businesses often try to offset these costs with short-term incentives like discounts and concessions, but that approach only treats the symptoms, not the root cause.
I understand the weight of this argument. What I am emphasizing is the intrinsic economic logic of true sustainability—independent of external incentives or marketing.
Sustainability as a Core Operation
When businesses genuinely integrate sustainability into their fundamental operations, it leads to inherent efficiencies and long-term cost savings.
This isn’t about “greenwashing” or surface-level gestures. It’s about fundamentally redesigning processes, supply chains, and product lifecycles to minimize environmental impact while improving economic resilience.
Systemic Benefits
If this approach were widely adopted, it would create a ripple effect throughout the global economy:
• Resource scarcity would be mitigated, reducing upward pressure on commodity prices.
• The need for costly regulatory interventions would diminish as businesses self-regulate through sustainable practices.
• The overall cost of production would decrease across all industries.
Think of the cost savings on legal and lobbyist fees - a game changer in itself.
Avoiding Future Costs
By preventing environmental damage at the outset, businesses would avoid the long-term financial burden of cleanup, remediation, and adaptation.
This would foster a more stable, predictable economic environment—one that supports long-term profitability rather than reacting to crises after the fact.
The Problem with Current Practices
Sustainability incentives—such as discounts and concessions—while sometimes useful, are ultimately a symptom of a deeper market failure. They attempt to compensate for inefficiencies rather than addressing the underlying problem.
The central argument here is that true sustainability is not a cost—it is a fundamental driver of economic efficiency and resilience.
Instead of a reactive approach that seeks to fix damage after it occurs, businesses should adopt a proactive strategy that prevents harm in the first place. This would create a win-win scenario where both the economy and the environment thrive.
If every business operated as sustainably as possible, the market would naturally self-correct, eliminating the need for many external interventions—including unpredictable corrective measures like inflation.
The Endogenous Sustainable Economy vs. The Circular Economy
The concept I am describing aligns with, and in many ways represents the ideal outcome of, the Circular Economy. However, there are key distinctions and I make no apologies:
Scope
• The Endogenous Sustainable Economy is a broad concept that encompasses environmental, social, and economic dimensions. It aims for long-term well-being by ensuring that present needs are met without compromising the ability of future generations to do the same.
• The Circular Economy is a specific framework focused on production and consumption. It primarily seeks to eliminate waste and maximize resource efficiency within an economic model.
Focus
• The Endogenous Sustainable Economy emphasizes the balance between ecological, social, and economic systems.
• The Circular Economy focuses on closed-loop systems, resource efficiency, and minimizing waste throughout the product lifecycle.
Methodology
• The Endogenous Sustainable Economy provides overarching principles and long-term goals.
• The Circular Economy offers concrete strategies and tools, such as:
• Designing out waste and pollution
• Keeping products and materials in use
• Regenerating natural systems
The Relationship Between the Two
The Endogenous Sustainable Economy argues that if businesses inherently integrate true sustainability into their core operations, the benefits that the Circular Economy seeks to achieve would emerge as a natural byproduct of those business practices.
Put simply:
• The Circular Economy is a structured approach to achieving sustainability.
• The Endogenous Sustainable Economy describes a scenario where sustainability is so deeply ingrained in business operations that the goals of the Circular Economy are achieved effortlessly.
In this sense, the two are strongly aligned. However, I am proposing a framework where the objectives of the Circular Economy are no longer an external goal but an internalized, self-sustaining reality.
This is a mitigation principle as I continue to think about the future of economics.
😮💨🏁💪🏾
Copyright © 2025 Jameel Gordon - All Rights Reserved.