Cat & Mouse: Car Manufacturers, Air Quality, Emmission Standards and the Public Health
The Air Quality Index (AQI), also known as the Air Quality Index or Indice in different parts of the world, has evolved over the years alongside scientific comprehension of air pollution and its health effects. However, these standards have frequently changed without clear scientific explanations or adequate communication to the general public, leaving many unaware of the rationale behind these alterations.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) periodically reviews and updates the AQI based on the latest research and public health considerations.
Here are some notable changes:
1970s-1990s: The original AQI focused on five pollutants: particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone.
1999: PM2.5 (fine particulate matter) was added as a separate pollutant due to its growing recognition as a significant health concern.
2004: The AQI formula was revised to account for the health effects of short-term and long-term exposure to different pollutants.
2012: The ozone standard was lowered, reflecting new research on its health impacts at lower concentrations.
2020: The PM2.5 standard was further tightened, recognizing its even greater contribution to respiratory problems.
Particulate matter (PM) is a general term for tiny particles suspended in the air, ranging in size from coarse dust to fine smoke. Sources include vehicle emissions, wildfires, and industrial processes.
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) specifically refers to particles with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less, about 30 times smaller than the width of a human hair. These are more concerning because they can penetrate deep into the lungs, causing respiratory problems and cardiovascular issues.
In the late 1990s, research revealed a strong link between exposure to PM2.5 and adverse health effects even at relatively low levels. This was a significant shift from earlier understanding that focused mainly on larger PM particles.
This discovery prompted the EPA to establish a separate AQI standard for PM2.5 in 1999, recognizing its distinct threat to public health compared to larger PM.
In 2012, the EPA tightened the AQI standard for ozone, lowering the threshold for the "unhealthy for sensitive groups" category. This decision was based on new research that demonstrated stronger evidence of ozone's negative impacts on respiratory function and lung inflammation, even at lower concentrations than previously thought.
Children, older adults, and individuals with asthma were found to be particularly vulnerable to ozone's harmful effects, necessitating stricter standards for their protection.
The lower standard led to more frequent "unhealthy" ozone days in some areas, raising awareness about ozone pollution and potentially prompting stricter emission regulations.
It also empowered individuals, especially those in sensitive groups, to take proactive steps to protect their health during high ozone periods.
These changes highlight the ongoing evolution of the AQI and the EPA's commitment to adapt to evolving scientific knowledge and prioritize public health protection in the face of air pollution risks.
Why does this matter you ask?
This reads like the EPA established emissions standards for car manufacturers didn’t actually reduce the emissions, but car manufacturers found ways to make the emissions particles smaller to avoid detection by federal and state inspection standards.
While the EPA sets emissions standards for pollutants like particulate matter (PM), manufacturers may not always directly reduce the total amount of emissions. Instead, they might focus on altering the size and composition of the particles to comply with the standards and the resulting effects is more dangerous and deathly air pollution.
Here's how this could have and can still play out:
The EPA sets an AQI standard for PM, measuring total mass of particles regardless of size. Instead of reducing overall emissions, carmakers might develop technologies to trap larger PM particles within the vehicle, releasing only smaller PM2.5 particles through the exhaust.
This strategy allows them to meet the PM standard technically, but it doesn't necessarily address the health concerns associated with smaller PM2.5 particles, which can penetrate deeper into the lungs and cause more harm.
This phenomenon has been observed in the past, particularly with diesel engines. While manufacturers reduced overall PM emissions, the proportion of smaller PM2.5 particles increased, raising concerns about potential health risks.
However, it's important to note that the situation is not always this simple.
The EPA is constantly evolving its regulations and standards, taking into account not just total mass but also particle size distribution and specific composition. They are also developing more sophisticated testing procedures to detect and penalize manufacturers who continue to manipulate emissions through size-based loopholes.
This is a complex cat-and-mouse game between regulation and innovation. While manufacturers might initially seek workarounds, the EPA's ongoing efforts to refine standards and testing methods push them towards genuinely cleaner technologies that reduce the total amount and harmful nature of emissions, not just their size.
Ultimately, the goal is to achieve cleaner air and protect public health, but this is difficult to achieve if the regulations and standards aren’t actually enforced. While challenges remain, people continue dying and the climate crisis worsens.
🍃Even eco-friendly, AI-loving entrepreneurs need a stylish digital home—explore Shopify and Squarespace themes handpicked for you.
Copyright © 2023 Jameel Gordon - All Rights Reserved.