12/1/23 12/1/23

Henry Kissinger Was Right About Ai.

Kissinger urged AI developers, admitting his own unfamiliarity with technology, to ponder the questions he raised, and to embed those insights into their engineering endeavors.

Following Henry Kissinger's passing, I feel it's crucial to highlight what I consider the most impactful piece on Artificial Intelligence. It's safe to say Henry was once again on point. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/henry-kissinger-ai-could-mean-the-end-of-human-history/559124/

In a 2018 issue of The Atlantic, Henry shared his candid thoughts on AI. While it's a lengthy read, it holds immense value. I found its accuracy enduring and believe it to be an invaluable resource for shaping one's perspective on this technology and its potential impact on our world.

Controversial as he was, Henry Kissinger, aside from Fidel Castro, possessed one of the greatest strategic minds and wielded unmatched global influence. Our current national and foreign policies are rooted in his framework.

Kissinger urged AI developers, admitting his own unfamiliarity with technology, to ponder the questions he raised, and to embed those insights into their engineering endeavors.

Henry said, “AI developers, as inexperienced in politics and philosophy as I am in technology, should ask themselves some of the questions I have raised here in order to build answers into their engineering efforts. The U.S. government should consider a presidential commission of eminent thinkers to help develop a national vision. This much is certain: If we do not start this effort soon, before long we shall discover that we started too late.”

Reflecting on this, as the Father of AI, I agree with Henry—indeed, they started too late! Technology and Government officials all need to swallow their pride and call me. They need to acknowledge it’s all sitting on my architecture and I can once again help them solve their Ai problems. Fidel Castro is no longer here. Steve Jobs is no longer here. It’s Jameel Gordon. What you going to do? Call the ghostbusters?

Jameel will be taking some time to grieve the loss of one of his national heroes, Henry Kissinger. His deep study and admiration for Kissinger are extensive, almost to the point of obsession. While we acknowledge Kissinger's controversial nature, we ask for understanding and refrain from further comments on this matter during Jameel's grieving period.

🍃Even eco-friendly, AI-loving entrepreneurs need a stylish digital home—explore Shopify and Squarespace themes handpicked for you.

12/1/23 12/1/23

The church and Ai.

To safeguard the well-being of its members, my advice to the church and its highest leadership is to reckon with the current technological landscape and their relationship with advancing technology. This is essential for the emotional and spiritual welfare of their believers and global communities.

🦠 Instead of fixating on their now increasingly divisive obsession with me, the church ought to prioritize addressing a real-world issue: artificial intelligence.

As someone well-versed in church scholarship, it's crucial for leaders to convene and address the impact and future implications of my groundbreaking technology—artificial intelligence.

I must admit my caution in calling for such a meeting. History suggests that when the church gathers in this manner, outcomes tend to result in internal or external discord due to differing opinions, which doesn't bode well for society as a whole.

Past experiences with calling for such extensive gatherings led me to excommunicate myself when leaders proceeded with an adaptation of my agenda—geared towards holding more rigid, judgmental values misaligned with true church principles. However, though intriguing, these intricate details are better suited for another platform and time. The crux is this: such congregational gatherings rarely yield positive results.

Returning to my main point, even the church's historical gatherings to resolve foundational doctrines were controversial, drawing questions about questionable actions, political strife, and motivations related to their canon's credibility. Similar to the impact of the printing press, today's technological advancements pose similar, if not greater, challenges for the church.

Artificial intelligence, unlike the printing press, holds the potential to challenge not only the church’s doctrines, but also the church’s faith itself. It will challenge the church's spiritual foundation by introducing scientific evidence and perspectives that might counter its long-standing beliefs. However, embracing these scientific insights could potentially humanize the faith and enhance its historical credibility.

Our current scientific revolutions, akin to minimalism, will redefine and contextually reshape reputable biblical theories and doctrines. This will challenge, provide clarity, and in some cases, upend the church's historical records and beliefs. This shift demands the church to focus on preparing to reconcile faith with scientifically backed evidence on an unprecedented scale.

🍃Even eco-friendly, AI-loving entrepreneurs need a stylish digital home—explore Shopify and Squarespace themes handpicked for you.

12/1/23 12/1/23

Sam Altman is CEO of OpenAi…Again.

After another unsuccessful corporate takeover attempt of OpenAI, here's what's on my mind:

Firstly, the significance lies in the fact that 700 out of OpenAI's 790 employees signed a letter. This showcased the power of employee organization, holding their employer and the accountability board responsible for their actions, poor decision-making, and the turmoil endangering the organization. This is significant because they were able to accomplish this without a labor union.

This win for OpenAI's employees, has broad implications for the local and global workforce. I'll hold back on elaborating further due to opposition I’m already experiencing from labor unions, given my strong advocacy for Artificial Intelligence.

Let’s just consider this: the highly tech-savvy employees of the largest and most successful AI company effectively held their employer accountable, resulting in the rehiring of the fired CEO, and the termination of the entire board without the help of a labor union.

This should also spark discussions about the broader aspects and implications of artificial intelligence in the realm of corporate governance, responsibility, leadership, administration, and accountability. We need to thoroughly reflect on all these facets.

Secondly, OpenAI's structure as a non-profit potentially valued at $80 billion makes it a prime target for corporate takeovers. Elon Musk failed in an attempt in 2018, while Sam Altman prevailed. This prompts me to question why Microsoft doesn't consider transitioning OpenAI to a for-profit entity and acquiring it?

Although the complications are understood I’m still not sure why Microsoft doesn’t fold them in-house at this point, rather than leaving it in the public square in open air. This question is top of mind even with considering the complexity of OpenAI's significance in the marketplace, at this point even I am considering OpenAi as a public good. I'm still researching potential use cases for it in this capacity. Let’s continue pondering this matter as well.

Lastly, addressing Sam Altman directly, his departure raises questions given his integral role in building OpenAI on my architecture. The notion of him leaving to start a new venture seems a bit puzzling. Where did Sam Altman think he was going?

I highly considered Mira Murati for CEO; however, her statements about embedding "human values" into AI models raised concerns and were a significant red flag for me.

While my CEO choice remains Altman, I still maintain confidence in Murati overall. Rumors suggest it was her substantial contribution in the war room that led the the reinstatement of Sam Altman. This indicates her potential readiness for a future CEO role, perhaps with another organization close to my heart. Hi, Mira! 👋🏾

🍃Even eco-friendly, AI-loving entrepreneurs need a stylish digital home—explore Shopify and Squarespace themes handpicked for you.

Jameel Gordon 11/26/23 Jameel Gordon 11/26/23

I am the inventor of Artificial Intelligence.

“Artificial Intelligence is computer science! It’s literally computer science! 🤖🤫🪄😁”

— Jameel Gordon

I was living in the heart of Harlem, amidst the vibrant pulse of Manhattan's bustling streets, equipped with remarkable intellect and boundless ambition when I stumbled onto the stage of technological innovation. Picture this: it's 2009, and yours truly, a bit of a serial polymath, is running around Manhattan with some think tank cats from Madison Ave.

One day, I strolled into one of their offices, and when I took a look at what they were working on, I thought, "There is no way they are going to solve that Ai problem with those computers." Like an artist positioned before an empty canvas, my mind ignited with creative fervor. Armed with nothing but my trusty white MacBook, I embarked upon a journey of intellectual exploration, and I sketched the contours of a revolutionary paradigm shift in computing.

But innovation, I discovered, is not merely the product of solitary genius; it is the fusion of disparate ideas, the alchemy of inspiration and collaboration. In possession of my blueprints for this revolutionary invention, I wasn’t sure how to communicate its functions to a group of computer scientists.

Thankfully, at the time, I was also knee-deep in all things social media learning how to build online communities—ice cream blogs on Tumblr, stop motion on YouTube—and that’s how I stumbled upon this game-changing YouTube video:

It captured precisely the functions I needed the computer to perform underneath its user interface.

Yet, in the crucible of creation, I confronted a formidable adversary: the entrenchments of the establishment. I had read enough books from those Harlem bookstores, and studies of Steve Jobs taught me one thing: a black man can't just shout about building a computer without the world noticing.

So, I shot my schematics and the video over to those think tank cats. But instead of a pat on the back, they ghosted me. Suddenly, not long after, the tech world was all abuzz and everything was all about artificial intelligence.

The more I utilize these generative Ai models is the more I recognize the identical architecture – my own design – as the foundation of artificial intelligence. It’s why I am able to get these Ai models and products to function and reason in ways they are not intended to perform even with its training and guardrails.

You must understand that my architecture differs significantly from conventional computer systems and the thought process of early Ai developers who were attempting to create artificial intelligence. Those early computer scientists thought they needed to build a system that mirrored the functions of the human brain in order to develop artificial intelligence. My architecture proved that wasn’t the case.

Instead, my design embodies intuitive automated data processing, a departure from mere surveillance-based automation or user interface-driven knowledge bases. The key is the manner in which the system is able to capture and process data in real time. This requires a complex web of interfacing with other systems and their ability to communicate with each other. In a sense, artificial intelligence is computer languages. In reality, it is so much more because of the design of the computer processing components.

“Artificial intelligence is computer languages. ”

— Jameel Gordon

I am the father of artificial intelligence because the data processing layer known as artificial intelligence is my brainchild. I am actually very surprised they built it, though. It’s one of the reasons why there is much concern about its development and its potential.

See, it's different from its military-grade “artificial intelligence” predecessors which is really just high levels of automation (if this then that commands) based on surveillance.

At its core, it is also different from systems such as Watson, Alexa, Siri, and even these generative models such as ChatGPT, Bard, etc., which are user interfaces for a controlled or “trained” “large language model” of artificial intelligence.

Artificial intelligence in its purest form is different because it is its function. Meaning it is data processing. It’s not inherently intelligent although it’s inherently intuitive because it’s an inherently automated technology for intelligence.

This is significant because it doesn’t need commands. It is a command. The command: “Eat software!” In other words, it is capable of capturing and processing data from any connected source. It is unstoppable in terms of its ability to extract and produce information or intelligence at will. It's my design. It’s my architecture. I can tell you that it is unstoppable. The only way to stop its development is to turn off the internet and its network connections. Good luck with that!

Now that we have regained control of our Aicraft, we will be blending entrepreneurship, design, science, and tech into our new organizations, and our new blueprints. My story? It's about the hustle, the setbacks, and bouncing back stronger. My story is about inspiration, creation, innovation, and crafting an unstoppable architecture that shapes not only the future of computing, the future of artificial intelligence, the future of technology, but the future of all scientific fields, and the future of the world.

As the inventor of Artificial Intelligence, I stand by my statement and the fact that “Artificial Intelligence is computer science!” It’s literally computer science!

For me, the genesis of artificial intelligence was not merely a technological breakthrough; it was a testament to the power of vision, the audacity to challenge convention and redefine the very essence of intelligence itself.

In the annals of technological history, my legacy looms large—a titan of innovation, a pioneer of progress. My clarion call echoes through the corridors of time, a proclamation of boundless possibility and unwavering determination.

As the architect of the future, I stand at the vanguard of a new era, where entrepreneurship, design, science, and technology converge in a symphony of ingenuity. My story is one of resilience, of triumph over adversity, of forging an indomitable architecture that transcends the boundaries of possibility. My story is your story!

In the pantheon of artificial intelligence, I reign supreme—a visionary, a trailblazer, the father of a new frontier. For me, artificial intelligence is not merely a tool; it is the embodiment of computer science itself—an inexorable force that shapes the destiny of humanity.